|
Hamers, J.H.M., Hessels, M.G.P.& Pennings, A.H.(1996). Learning potential in ethnic
minority children. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 12(3), 183-192.
Hamers, J.H.M., Hessels, M.G.P.,
& Tissink, J. (1995). Research on learning potential. In J.S. Carlson (Ed.), Advances in Cognition and Educational Practice,
Volume 3, European Contributions to Dynamic Assessment (pp. 145-183). Greenwich: JAI Press.
Hamers, J.H.M., Hessels,
M.G.P., & Van Luit, J.E.H. (1991). Leertest voor etnische minderheden: Test en
handleiding. [Learning potential
test for ethnic
minorities: Test and manual]. Lisse:Swets & Zeitlinger.
Hamers, J., Pennings, A., &
Guthke, J. (1994). Training-based assessment of school achievement. Learning and Instruction, 4, 347-360.
Hamers,
J.H.M. & Ruijssenaars, A.J.J.M. (1996). Assessing classroom learning potential. In G.G. Phye (Ed.). Handbook of academic
learning (pp. 549-571). San Diego,CA:Academic Press.
Hamers, J.H.M., & Resing, W.C.M. (1993). Learning potential
assessment: Introduction. In J.H.M. Hamers, K. Sijtsma, & A.J.J.M. Ruijssenaars (Eds.), Learning potential assessment.
Theoretical, methodological and practical issues. Amsterdam / Berwyn P.A.: Swets & Zeitlinger Inc. (p. 23-41).
Hamers, J.H.M., Sijtsma, K., & Ruijssenaars, A.J.J.M. (Eds.) (1993). Learning potential assessment: Theoretical, methodological
and practical issues. Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Hamers, J.H.M., Van Luit, J.E.H., & Hessels, M.G.P.
(1989). Learning potential test for Ethnic Minorities: Final Report Part A [Leertest voor Etnische Minderheden: Eindrapport
Deel A]. Utrecht: ISOR, Rijksuniversiteit Utrecht.
Haney, M.R. & Evans, J.G. (1999). National survey
of school psychologists regarding use of dynamic assessment and other nontraditional techniques. Psychology in the Schools,
35(4), 295-304.
Hansen, A. A. (2000). Hva innebaerer dynamisk testing? Skolepsykologi, nr.1. 11-45
Harris, J.L. (2003). Epilogue: Toward an understanding of literacy issues in multicultural school-age populations.
Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 34 (1), 80-82.
Hasselhorn, M. & Mahler, C. (1992). Kategorisierungstraining
bei Grund-und Sonderschulern (L): Zur Rolle metamemorialer Instruktionselemente (Training of categorizing in regular and special
education students. The role of metamemory elements of instruction). Psychologie in Erziehung und Untericht, 39, 179-189.
Hasson, N. & Joffe, V.L. (2007). The case for Dynamic Assessment in speech and language therapy. Child Language
Teaching and Therapy, Vol. 23, No. 1, -25.
Hatton, M.E.(1991). Dynamic assessment: A validation study. Dissertation
Abstracts International, 52(2-A), 473.
Hausman, R.M. (1973). Efficacy of three learning potential assessment procedures
with Mexican-American educable mentally retarded children. Dissertation Abstacts International, 33 (7-A), 3438.
Haywood,
H.C. (1973). The effects of different levels of enriched stimulus input, intelligence, and age on abstracting abilities of
children. Paper, 97th annual meeting of the American Association on Mental Deficiency, Atlanta, June, 1973.
Haywood,
H. C. (1977). Alternatives to normative assessment. In P. Mittler (Ed.), Research to practice in mental retardation: Proceedings
of the 4th Congress of IASSMD. Vol. 2, Education and training, pp. 11-18. Baltimore: University Park Press.
Haywood,
H.C. (1979). Learning potential assessment in the study of mental retardation in Tennessee: A case study. In M. J. Begab (Chairman),
Dynamic assessment viewed cross-culturally. Symposium, 5th International Congress of the International Association for the
Scientific Study of Mental Deficiency, Jerusalem, August, 1979.
Haywood, H. C. (1981). Review of R. Feuerstein,
Y. Rand, & M. Hoffman, The dynamic assessment of retarded performers. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 11,
240-247.
Haywood, H.C. (1985). The malleability of intelligence: cognitive processes as a function of polygenic-experiential
interaction. Keynote address, Annual Convention of the National Association of School Psychologists, Las Vegas, May, 1985.
Haywood, H. C. (1988). Dynamic assessment: The Learning Potential Assessment Device (LPAD). In R. L. Jones (Ed.),
Psychoeducational assessment of minority group children: A casebook, pp. 39-63. Richmond, VA: Cobb & Henry.
Haywood, H. C. (1992a). Interactive assessment: A special issue. In H. C. Haywood (Guest editor), Journal of Special Education,
26, 233-234.
Haywood, H. C. (Guest editor) (1992b). Special focus section on dynamic assessment. Journal of Special
Education. 26(3).
Haywood, H. C. (1992c). The strange and wonderful symbiosis of motivation and cognition. International
Journal of Cognitive Education and Mediated Learning, 2 (3), 186-197.
Haywood, H. C. (1993). A mediational teaching
style. International Journal of Cognitive Education and Mediated Learning, 3 (1), 27-38.
Haywood, H. C. (1995).
Mediated learning: A unique way to level the playing field. The Thinking Teacher, 10 (1), 2-9.
Haywood, H. C. (1997).
Interactive assessment. In R. Taylor (Ed.), Assessment in Mental Retardation, 103-129. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing
Group.
Haywood, H.C. (2001). What is dynamic "testing?" A Response to Sternberg and Grigorenko. Issues
in Education, 7 (2), 201-210.
Haywood, H.C. (2002). Contemporary issues in psychological and educational assessment.
Special issue, Peabody Journal of Education, 77 (2). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Haywood, H.C. (2008). Twenty years of
IACEP, and a focus on dynamic assessment: Progress, problems, and prospects. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology,
7(3), 419-442. Haywood, H. C., Brown, A. L., & Wingenfeld, S. (1990). Dynamic approaches to psychoeducational
assessment. School Psychology Review. 19 (4), 411-422.
Haywood, H. C., Filler, J. W. Jr., Shifman, M. A., &
Chatelanat, G. (1975). Behavioral assessment in mental retardation. In P. McReynolds (Ed.), Advances in psychological assessment,
Vol.3, pp. 96-136. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Haywood, H.C. & Lidz, C.S. (2005). International
survey of dynamic assessment trainers. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 5(2), 181-198. Haywood,
H.C. & Lidz, C.S. (2007). Dynamic assessment in practice: Clinical and educational applications. New York: Cambridge University
Press.
Haywood, H. C. & Miller, M. B. (2002a). Group dynamic assessment of adults with traumatic brain injury.
Invited paper, European Regional Conference of the International Association for Cognitive Education, Rimini (Italy), May,
2002. Also presented as an invited paper at the Fourth European Conference on Psychological Theory and Research in Mental
Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, Catania (Italy), May, 2002.
Haywood, H. C. & Miller, M. B. (2002b).
?valuation dynamique en groupe chez adultes qui ont suffert des enc?phalopathies traumatiques. North American Regional Conference
of the International Association for Cognitive Education, Montreal (Canada), May, 2002.
Haywood, H.C. & Miller,
M.B. (2003). Dynamic assessment of adult with traumatic brain injuries. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology [online],
3, 137-163. www.iace.coged.org
Haywood, H. C., & Switzky, H. N. (1974). Children's verbal abstracting: Effects
of enriched input, age, and IQ. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 78, 556-565.
Haywood, H.C. & Tzuriel,
D. (Eds.). (1992a). Interactive assessment. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Haywood, H. C. & Tzuriel, D. (1992b).
The status and future of interactive assessment. In H. C. Haywood & D. Tzuriel (Eds.), Interactive assessment, pp. 504-507.
New York: Springer Verlag.
Haywood, H. C. & Tzuriel, D. (2002). Applications and challenges in dynamic assessment.
Peabody Journal of Education, 77 (2), 40-63.
Haywood, H. C., Tzuriel, D., & Vaught, S. (1992). Psychoeducational
assessment from a transactional perspective. In H. C. Haywood & D. Tzuriel (Eds.), Interactive assessment, pp. 38-63.
New York: Springer Verlag.
Haywood, H. C. & Wingenfeld, S. A. (1992). Interactive assessment as a research
tool. In H. C. Haywood (Guest editor), Journal of Special Education. 26(3), 253-268.
Hegarty, S. (1988). Learning
ability and psychometric practice. In R.M. Gupta & P. Coxhead (Eds.), Cultural diversity and learning efficiency: Recent
developments in assessment (pp. 22-38). New York: St. Martin's Press.
Heinrich, J.J. (1991). Responsiveness of
adults with severe head injury to mediated learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Vanderbilt University.
Heller,,
K.A. & Schofield, N.J. (2008). Identification and nurturing the gifted from an international perspective. In S.I. Pfeiffer
(Ed.). Handbook of giftedness in children: Psychoeducational theory, research, and best practices (pp.93-114). New York: Springer.
Henk, W.A. (1993). New dimensions in reading assessment.
Reading & Writing Quarterly, 9(1), 103-120.
Hessels, M.G.P. (1988). Learning potential test for Ethnic Minorities: Manual for the second experimental version [Leertest
voor Etnische Minderheden: Handleiding bij de tweede experimentele versie]. Utrecht: Rijksuniversiteit Utrecht.
Hessels,
M.G.P. (1993). Learning potential test for Ethnic Minorities: Theoretical and Empirical Foundation [Leertest voor Etnische
Minderheden: theoretische en empirische verantwoording]. Dissertation Utrecht University. Rotterdam: RISBO.
Hessels,
M.G.P. (1994a). Learning potential test for Ethnic Minorities: A Theoretical and Empirical Foundation. Cognitive Education,
5, 2, 2-3.
Hessels, M.G.P. (1994b). The assessment of learning potential: the Learning potential test for Ethnic
Minorities [Diagnostiek van het leerpotentieel: de Leertest voor Etnische Minderheden]. Vraagstelling, 1, 3, 101-112.
Hessels, M.G.P. (1995). The measurement of change: the advantages of item response theory [Het meten van verandering: de
voordelen van Item Respons Theorie]. Vraagstelling, 2, 1, 91-102.
Hessels, M.G.P. (1995a). How valid are learning
potential scores? A comparison of the validities of learning potential test scores and traditional IQ scores. European Journal
of Psychological Assessment, 11, Supplement No. 1, 82.
Hessels, M.G.P. (1995b). The Learning potential test for
Ethnic Minorities: description and some results [De Leertest voor Etnische Minderheden: beschrijving en enige onderzoeksresultaten].
In Vereniging van Psychodiagnostisch Werkenden, Nieuwe Ontwikkelingen in de Psychodiagnostiek. Ede: VVP.
Hessels,
M.G.P. (1996). Ethnic differences in learning potential test scores: Research into item and test bias in the Learning potential
test for Ethnic Minorities. Journal of Cognitive Education, 5, 2, 133-153.
Hessels, M.G.P. (1997). Low IQ but high
learning potential: Why Zeyneb and Moussa do not belong in special education. Educational and Child Psychology, 14, 121-136.
Hessels, M.G.P. (2000). The Learning Potential Test
For Ethnic Minorities (LEM): A tool for standardized
Assessment of children in kindergarten and the first years Of primary school. In C.S. Lidz and J.G. Elliott (Eds.).Dynamic
assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp.109-132). Amsterdam: JAI/Elsevier.
Hessels, M.G.P. (2000). The
Learning potential test for Ethnic Minorities: A tool for standardized assessment of children in kindergarten and the first
years of primary school. In C.S. Lidz & J. Elliott, Dynamic Assessment: Prevailing models and applications. New York:
Elseviers.
Hessels, M.G.P. (2001). The Zone of Proximal Development of Psychological Assessment. In J.F. Beckmann
& P.Y. Herzberg (Eds.), Dynamik im Testen. Perspektiven auf die Zone der n?chsten Entwicklung in der Psychodiagnostik.
Festschrift zum 60. Geburtstug von J?rgen Guthke. Landau: Verlag Empirische Pedagogik.
Hessels, M.G.P. (2009).
Estimation of the predictive validity of the HART by means of a dynamic test of geography. Journal of Cognitive Education
and Psychology, 8 (1), 5-21.
Hessels, M. G. P., Berger, J.-L., & Bosson, M. (2008). Group assessment of learning
potential of pupils in mainstream primary education and special education classes. Journal of Cognitive
Education and
Psychology [online], 7(1), 43-69.
Hessels, M.G.P., & Hamers, J.H.M. (1991). Learning potential test for Ethnic
Minorities. [Leertest voor Etnische Minderheden]. In A.H. Pennings, A. van der Ley, W. Meeuws, B. Rang & T. Wubbels (red.),
Bijdragen aan pedagogisch onderzoek 1990. Amersfoort: ACCO.
Hessels, M.G.P., & Hamers, J.H.M. (1992). Learning
potential test for Ethnic Minorities: Final Report Part B [Leertest voor Etnische Minderheden: Eindrapport Deel B]. Utrecht:
ISOR, Universiteit Utrecht.
Hessels, M.G.P. & Hamers. J.H.M. (1993). A learning potential test for ethinic
minorities. In J.H.M. Hamers, K.Sijtsma, & A.J.J.M. Ruijssenaars (Eds.). Learning potential assessment (pp. 285-312).
Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinger.
Hessels, M.G.P., & Hamers, J.H.M. (1993). A Learning potential test for Ethnic
Minorities. In J.H.M. Hamers, K. Sijtsma & A.J.J.M. Ruijssenaars (red.), Learning Potential Assessment: Theoretical, Methodological
and Practical Issues (pp. 285-311). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Hessels, M.G.P., Hamers, J.H.M., & Van Luit,
J.E.H. (1988). Second Interim report of the project Learning potential test for Ethnic Minorities [Tweede Interimverslag van
het project Leertest voor Etnische Minderheden]. Utrecht: ISOR, Rijksuniversiteit Utrecht.
Hessels, M.G.P., &
Hessels-Schlatter, C. (2002). Learning potential in immigrant children in two countries: The Dutch and the Swiss-French version
of the Learning Potential Test for Ethnic Minorities. In D.G.M. van der Aalsvoort, W.C.M. Resing, & A.J.J.M. Ruijssenaars,
Learning potential assessment and cognitive training (Vol. 7). Actual research and perspectives in theory building and methodology
(pp. 227-245). New York: Elsevier Inc.
Hessels, M.G.P., & Schlatter, C. (1999). Test d'apprentissage pour
les enfants ?trangers en Suisse. Manuel experimental. Erasmus University, Rotterdam/Universite de Geneve.
Hessels,
M.G.P., & Schlatter, C. (1999). Test d'apprentissage pour les enfants etrangers en Suisse. Test et manuel. Lisse, Pays-Bas:
Swets & Zeitlinger.
Hessels, M.G.P., & Schlatter, C. (en preparation). L'evaluation du potentiel d'apprentissage
chez des enfants suisses, espagnols et portuguais.
Hessels-Schlatter, C. (submitted). Enhancement of inductive
reasoning in persons with severe impairments.
Hessels-Schlatter, C. (2001). Evaluation des comp?tences cognitives
et de la capacit? d'apprentissage. Revue de P?dagogie Sp?cialis?e, 3, 28-31.
Hessels-Schlatter, C. (2002a). A
dynamic test to assess learning capacity in people with severe impairments. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 107(5),
340-351.
Hessels-Schlatter, C. (2002b). The Analogical Reasoning Learning Test: Theoretical and Empirical Foundation
of a Diagnostic Tool for Individuals with Moderate Mental Retardation [Abstract]. ?ournal of Cognitive Education and Psychology,
2(2), 177-179. Retrieved October 15, 2002, from http://www.iace.coged.org/
Hessels-Schlatter, C. (2002c). Moderate
mental retardation and learning capacity: The Analogical Reasoning Learning Test. In D.G.M. van der Aalsvoort, W.C.M. Resing,
& W.J.J.M. Ruijssenaars (Eds.), Learning potential assessment and cognitive training (Vol. 7). Actual research and perspectives
in theory building and methodology (pp. 249-271). New York: Elsevier Inc.
Hickson, J. & Skuy, M. (1990). Creativity
and cognitive modifiability in gifted disadvantaged pupils: A promising alliance. School Psychology International, 11(4),
295-301. Hill, K. & Sabet, M. (2009). Dynamic speaking assessments. TESOL Quarterly, 43(3),
537-545.
Hilliard, A.G., III (1990). Misunderstanding and testing intelligence. In J.I. Goodlad
& P.Keating (Eds.). Access to knowledge: An agenda for our nation's schools (pp. 145-157). New York: College Entrance
Examination Board.
Hirsch, J. (1989). Assessing the potential of underachieving college students: Feuerstein's
Learning Potential Assessment Device. Paper presented at the Montclair State College Institute for Critical Thinking Conference,
Upper Montclair, NY, October 19021. ED325572
Howard, C.B (2005). Assessment of children with learning disabilities:
Does the promise of dynamic assessment withstand the test of time? Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities
and Social Sciences, 65 (10-A), 3691.
Hoy, M.M. (1984). The perceived value of the standard psychological report
compared with the Learning Potential Assessment Device report. Dissertation Abstracts International, 44(9-A), 2741-2742.
Hsu, C-H. (2004). The effectiveness research of applying mulsti-stage dynamic assessment to mathematics problem solving
teaching for first graders on present curriculum (article written in Chinese). Journal of Education and Psychology, 27 (4),
721-749.
Hulburt, J.G. (1995) A comparison of the usefulness of dynamic assessment reports, standard psychological
reports and curriculum-based assessment reports to pre-school teachers in designing instruction for young children with disabilities.
Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 56(6-A), 2173.
Humphries, T.,
Krogh, K. & McKay, R. (2001). Theoretical and practical considerations in the psychological and educational assessment
of the student with intractable epilepsy: Dynamic assessment as an adjunct to static assessment. Seizure, 10(3), 173-180.
Hurtig, M. (1954). Recherche sur la perfectibilité. Les effets de l'explication Progressive Matrices 47 de
Raven chez l'enfant normal et l'enfant d´bile. Enfance.
Hurtig, M. (1960). Etude expérimentale des
possibilitiés d'apprentissage intellectual d'enfants débiles et d'enfants normaux. Enfance, 4-5.
Hurtig,
M. (1967). Constat d'acquisitions ou pronostic d'apprentissage, Peut-on dynamiser la psychométrie? Revue Suisse de
Psychologie, 26.
Hwa-Froelich, D.A. & Matsuo, H.(2005). Vietnamese children and language-based processing tasks.
Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 36(3), 230-243.
Hymer, B., Michel, D., & Todd, L. (2002).
Dynamic consultation: Toward process and challenge. Educational Psychology in Practice, 18(1), 47-62.
Ionescu,
S. & Jourdan-Ionescu, C. (1985). L'évaluation du potentiel d'apprentissage. 1. Utilisation du test des cubes. Bulletin
de Psychologie, 38 (372).
Ionescu, S., Jourdan-Ionescu, C. & Alain, M. (1986). L'évaluation du potentiel
d'apprentissage, II. Une novelle méthode de quantification. Bulletin de Psychologie, XL (380).
Istvan, S.
(2004). Uj nézopontok és fogalmak az értelmi potencial kiértékelésében. Erdelyi
Pszicholigiai Szemie, 5(1), 3-17. (Romania)
|
Laing, S.P. & Kamhi, A. (2003). Alternative assessment
of language and literacy in culturally and linguistically diverse populations. Language, Speech, & Hearing Services in
Schools, 34(1), 44-55.
Lajoie, S.P. (2005). Extending the scaffolding metaphor. Instructional Science, 33(5-6),
541-557.
Lajoie, S.P. & Lesgold, A.M. (1992). Dynamic assessment of proficiency for solving procedural knoledge
tasks. Educational Psychology, 27(3), 365-384.
Landor, M. (2006). An exploration of the perceived effects of
giving verbal and video feedbak to the child, following dynamic assessment. Master of Science in Educational Psychology thesis,
University of Dundee.
Landor, M., Lauchlan, F., Carrigan, D., & Kennedy, H. (2007). Feeding back the results
of dynamic assessment to the child. Advances in Speech-Language Pathology, 9(4), 346-353.
Langdon, H.W., Novak,
J.M., & Quintanar, R.S. (2000). Setting the teaching-learning wheel in motion in assessing language minority students.
Multicultural Perspectives, 2(2), 3-9.
Lantolf, J.P. & Poehner, M.E. (2004). Dynamic assessment: Bringing
the past into the future. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1, 49-74.
Lantolf, J.P. & Poehner, M.E. (2006).
Dynamic assessment in the foreign language classroom: A teacher's guide. CALPER University Park, Pennsylvania.
Lantolf, J.P. and Poehner, M.E. (2007). Dynamic Assessment, In E. Shohamy, Ed., N. Hornberger, Gen. Ed., Encylopedia of Language
and Education Volume 7. Language Testing and Assessment, Springer Publishing.
Lantolf, J.P. and Thorne, S.L.:
2006, The Sociogenesis of Second Language Development, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Larsen, J.A. & Nippold, M.A.
(2007). Morphological analysis in school-age children: Dynamic assessment of a word learning strategy. Language, Speech, and
Hearing Services in Schools,
Larson, G.E., Alderton, D.L. & Kaupp, M.A. (1991). Dynamic administration of
a general intelligence test. Learning and Individual Differences, 3(2), 123-134.
Larson, J.A. & Nippold, M.A.
(2007). Morphological analysis in school-age children: Dynamic assessment of a word learning strategy. Language, Speech, and
Hearing Services in Schools, 38(3), 201-212.
Latuheru, E.J., & Hessels, M.G.P. (1993). School records of
minority pupils: the influence of ethnic descent. [Schoolprestaties van allochtone leerlingen: de invloed van etnische herkomst.
RISBO-paper nr. S41.] Rotterdam: Erasmus Universiteit.
Lauchlan, F. (2001). Addressing the social,cognitive
and emotional needs of children: The case for dynamic assessment. Educational & Child Psychology, 18(4), 4-18. Lauchlan, F. (2005). A welcome update of a cognitive education classic: Feuerstein et al. on Dynamic
Assessment: A review of Feuerstein, Feuerstein, Falik, & Rand's, The Dynamic Assessment of Cognitive Modifiabioity, The
Learning Propensity Assessment Device: Theory, instruments, and techniques. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology,
4(3), 377-379, Lauchlan, F. and Elliott, J. (1997) ‘The use of
the Cognitive Modifiability Battery as an intervention tool for children with complex learning difficulties’' Educational
and Child Psychology, 14(4), 137-148.
Lauchlan, F. & Elliott, J. (2001). The psychological assessment of
learning potential. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(4), 647-665.
Laughon,P. (1990). The dynamic
assessment of intelligence: A review of three approaches. School Psychology Review, 19(4), 459-470.
Lauth, G.
& Wiedl, K.H. (1985). Zur Veranderbarkeit der Testleistung im CFT 20 durch Instruktionsinternsivierung (The modifiability
of CFT 20 test performance under the influence of intensified instruction). Diagnostica, 31, 200-109.
Lauth,
G.W. & Wiedl, K.H. (1989). Cognitive teaching methods for special education: Development of approaches for intervention
and assessment in Germany. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 36(3), 187-202.
Lautrey,
J. (1994). L'évaluation du potentiel d'apprentissage, état de la question. In M. Huteau (Ed.), Les techniques
psychologiques d'évaluation des personnes. Issy-les-Moulineaux: EAP.
Law, J. & Camilleri, B. (2007).
Dynamic assessment and its application to children with speech and language learning difficulties. Advances in Speech-Language
Pathology, 9(4), 271-272. Lederberg, A.R., & Spencer, P.E. (2009). Word-learning
abilities in deaf and hard-of-hearing preschoolers: Effect of lexicon size and language modality. Journal of Deaf Studies
and Deaf Education, 14(1), 44-62.
Leeuw, L.de & Resing, W.C.M. (1988). Leerpotentieel en diagnostiek. [Learning
potential and psychodiagnostics]. In Gl Kanselaar, J.L. van der Linden & A. Pennings (Eds.). Begaafdheid: onderkenning
en beinvloeding. Amersfoort: Acco (pp. 55-68). Leung. C. (2007). Dynamic assessment: Assessment for
and as teaching? Language Assessment Quarterly: An International Journal, 4, 257-278. Levine, R. (2009). Curriculum-based dynamic assessment
emphasizing a triarchic model and language abilities: Examining the utility of this testing method in elementary school mathematics
classrooms. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering. 70(2-B). 1349. Lewis, B.A. (1998). Teacher satisfaction with standardized assessment reports: Implications
for the use of dynamic assessment as an alternative assessment method. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities
& Social Sciences, 59 (6-A), 1906.
Lidz, C.S. (1983). Dynamic assessment and the preschool child. Journal
of Psychoeducational Assessment 1, 59-72.
Lidz, C.S. (Ed.). (1987a). Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach
to evaluating learning potential. New York: Guilford.
Lidz, C.S. (1987b). Historical perspectives. In C.S. Lidz
(Ed.). Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 3- ). New York: Guilford.
Lidz, C.S. (1987b). Cognitive deficiencies revisited. In C.S. Lidz (Ed.). Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach
to evaluating learning potential (pp. 444-475).
New York: Guilford.
Lidz, C.S. (1990). The Preschool Learning
Assessment Device: An approach to the dynamic assessment of young children. European Journal of Psychology of Education. V
(2), 167-175.
Lidz, C.S. (1991). Practitioners’ guide to dynamic assessment. New York: Guilford.
Lidz, C.S. (1992a). Dynamic assessment: Some thoughts on the model, the medium, and the message. Learning and Individual
Differences, 4 (2), 125-136.
Lidz, C.S. (1992b). The extent of incorporation of dynamic assessment into cognitive
assessment courses: A national survey of school psychology trainers. Journal of Special Education, 26 (3). 325-331.
Lidz, C.S. (1995). Dynamic assessment and the legacy of L.S. Vygotsky. School Psychology International, 16, 143-153.
Lidz, C.S. (1996). Dynamic assessment approaches. In D.P. Flanagan, J.L. Genshaft, & P.L. Harrison (Eds.). Contemporary
intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp.281-195). New York: Guilford.
Lidz, C.S. (1997a). Dynamic
assessment:Psychoeducational assessment with cultural sensitivity. Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless, 6 (2), 95-
.
Lidz, C.S. (1997b). Dynamic assessment: Restructuring the role of school psychologists. Communiqué,
25 (8).
Lidz, C.S. (2000a). The Application of Cognitive Functions Scale (ACFS): An example of curriculum-based
dynamic assessment. In C.S. Lidz & J.G. Elliott (Eds.). Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp. 407-439).
Amsterdam: JAI/Elsevier Science.
Lidz, C.S. (2000b). Theme and some variations on the concepts of mediated learning
experience and dynamic assessment. In A.Kozulin & Y. Rand (Eds.). Experience of mediated learning:An impact of Feuerstein's
theory in education and psychology (Pp. 166-174). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
Lidz, C.S. (2001). Dynamic assessment.
In W.E.Craighead & C.B. Nemeroff (Eds.). The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology and Behavioral Science (pp. 465-466)..
New York: John Wiley.
Lidz, C.S. (2001b). Multicultural issues and dynamic assessment. In L.A. Suzuki, J.G. Ponterotto,
& P.J. Meller (Eds.). Handbook of multicultural assessment: Clinical, psychological, and educational applications, second
edition (pp.523-540). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Lidz, C.S. (2002). Mediated learning experience (MLE) as a
basis for an alternative approach to assessment. School Psychology Internaitonal, 23 (1), 68-84.
Lidz, C.S. (2003a).
Dynamic assessment. In C.S. Lidz. Early childhood assessment (pp.112-132). New York: John Wiley.
Lidz, C.S. (2003
b). Dynamic assessment (learning potential testing, testing the limits). In R. Fernandez-Ballesteros (Ed.). Encyclopedia of
Psychological Assessment (pp. 337-343). London: Sage.
Lidz, C.S. (2004a). Successful application of a dynamic
assessment procedure with young deaf students betwen the ages of four and eight years. Educational and Child Psychology, 21
(1), 59-73.
Lidz, C.S. (2004b). Dynamic assessment entry in The Concise Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology and
Behavioral Science, Third Edition (;;. 302-303). W.E. Craighead and C.B. Nemeroff (Eds.). New York: Wiley.
Lidz,
C.S. (2005a). The Application of Cognitive Functions Scale: A dynamic assessment procedure for young children. In O-S
Tan & A. Seok-Hoon Seng (Eds.), Enhancing cognitive functions: Applications across contexts (pp. 77-101). Singapore: McGraw-Hill.
Lidz, C.S. 2005b). Dynamic assessment with
young children: We've come a long way baby! Journal of Early Childhood and Infant Psychology, 1, 99-112. Lidz, C.S. (2009a). Dynamic assessment: Progress, problems, and prospects: A commentary on Karpov
and Tzuriel. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychcology, 8 (3), 238-241. Lidz, C.S. (2009b). Dynamic assessment in School Psychology. Communiqué, October, 38 (2), 16-18. Lidz, C.S. (2010). Book review: M.E. Poehner, Dynamic Assessment: A Vygotskian
approach to understanding and promoting L2 development. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 9(1),87-88. Lidz, C.S. & Elliott,
J.G. (Eds.). (2000). Dynamic assessment:Prevailing models and applications. Amsterdam: JAI/Elsevier Science.
Lidz, C.S. & Elliott, J.G. (2006). Use of dynamic assessment with gifted students. Gifted Education International, 21,
151-161.
Lidz, C.S. & Gindis, B. (2003). Dynamic assessment of the evolving cognitive functions in children
with typical and atypical development. In A. Kozulin, V. Ageyev, S. Miller, & B. Gindis (Eds.). Vygotsky's theory of education
in cultural context [pp. 99-116]. New York: Cambridge Univeristy Press.
Lidz, C.S. & Greenberg,K.H. (1997).
Criterion validity of a group dynamic assessment procedure with rural first grade regular education students. Journal of Cognitive
Education, 6 (8), 89- .
Lidz, C.S. & Jepsen, R.H. ( 2000). The Application of
Cognitive Functions Scale.
Unpublished manuscript:
contact C.S. Lidz: zdilsc@aol.com
Lidz, C.S., Jepsen, R.H., & Miller, M.B.
(1997). Relationships between cognitive processes and academic achievement: Application of a group dynamic assessment procedure
with multiply handicapped adolescents. Educational and Child Psychology, 14, 56-67.
Lidz, C.S. & Macrine, S.
(2001). Identification of minority and immigrant students for gifted education: The contribution of dynamic assessment. School
Psychology International, 22 (1), 74-96.
Lidz, C.S., & Peña, E. (1996). Dynamic assessment: The model,
its relevance as a non-biased approach and its application to Latino-American preschool children. Language, Speech and Hearing
Services in Schools, 27(4), 367-372. Liidz, C.S. Y Peña, E.D. (2009). Response to Intervention:
Do we just appear to be speaking the same language? Seminars in Speech and Language, 30, 121-134, Lidz,
C.S. & Thomas, C. (1987). The Preschool Learning Assessment Device: Extension of a static approach. In C.S. Lidz (Ed.).
Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 288- ). New York: Guilford.
Lidz, C.S. & Van Der Aaslvoort, G.M. (2005). A kognitiv funkciok skala alkalmazasanak adaptacioja holland kisgyerekek
szamara (Usefulness of the Application of Cognitive Functions Scale with young children from the Netherlands). Erkelyi Pszichologiai
Szemie, 6(1) 25-44. http://www.pszichologia.ro/english/title.htm
Transylvanian Journal of Psychology, Special Issue,
83-99.
Lifshitz, H., Tzuriel, D. & Weiss, I. (2005). Effects of training
in conceptual versus perceptual analogies among adolescents and adults with intellectual disability. Journal of Cognitive
Education and Psychology, 5 (2), 144-170.
Lindgren, K.P. (2007). Sexual intent perceptions: Review
and integration of findings, investigation of automatic processes, and development and implementation of a dynamic assessment
methodology. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: he Sciences and Engineering, 67(9-B), 5469.
Linhares,
Maria Beatriz M., Escolano, Ângela C.M., & Enumo, Sônia R.F. (Eds.) (2006). Avaliação assistida:
Fundamentos, procedimentos e aplicabilidade [Dynamic assessment: Basis, procedures and aplicability]. São Paulo, SP,
Brazil: Casa do Psicólogo. 134 pp. ISBN 85-7396-458-8. http://www.casadopsicologo.com.br Lloyd. P.(Ed.).(1999). Lev
Vygotsky: Critical assessments: Future directions, Vol. IV. Florence, KY:Taylor & Francis/Routledge.
Lloyd,
P. & Fernyhough, C. (Eds.). (1999). Lev Vygotsky: Critical assessments: The zone of proximal development. Vol.III. Florence,
KY: Taylor & Frances/Routledge.
Lolwana, P.P. (1991). Comparative analysis of dynamic assessment using a nonverbal
standardized intelligence test and a verbal curriculum-based test. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52(2-A), 477.
Losardo, A. & Notari-Syverson, A. (2001). Alternative approaches to assessing young children. Baltimore: Paul
H. Brookes.
Lussier, C.M. (2002). Does dynamic assessment reduce the influence of str ess on memory and reasoning?
Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, Dec., 63 (5-A). 1711.
Luther,
M.G., Cole, E., & Gamlin, P.J. (Eds.). (1996). Dynamic assessment for instruction: From theory to application. North York,
ON: Captus.
Luther, M. & Wyatt, F. (1989). A comparison of Feuerstein's method of (LPAD) assessment with conventional
I.Q. testing on disadvantaged North York high school students. International Journal of Dynamic Assessment & Instruction,
1(1), 49-64.
Luther, M.G. & Wyatt, F. (1996). A comparison of Feuerstein's method of LPAD assessment with
conventional I.Q. testing on disadvantaged North York high school students. In M.G. Luther, E. Cole, et al. (Eds.). Dynamic
assessment for instruction: From theory to application (pp. 168-181). North York, ON: Captus.
|
|
Jacobs, E.L. (2001). The effects of adding dynamic assessment components to a
computerized preschool language screening test. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 22(4), 217-226.
Jarvela, S.,
Salonen, J., & Lepola, J. (2001). Dynamic assessment as a key to understanding student motivation in a classroom context.
In P. Pintrich & M. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in research on motivation: New directions in methods and measures. Volume 12,
Pp. 217-240. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Jeltova, I., Birney, D., Fredine, N., Jarvin, L, Sternberg, R.J., & Grigorenko,
E.L. (20007). Dynamic assessment as a process-oriented assessment in educational settings. Advances in Speech-Language Pathology,
9(4), 273-285.
Jensen, M.R. (1985). The Learning Potential Assessment Device and low functioning Navajo children.
In S. Unger (Ed.). To sing our own songs: Cognition and culture in Indian education. New York: Association on American Indian
Affairs.
Jensen, M.R. (1990). Change models and some evidence for phases and their plasticity in cognitive structures.
The International Journal of Cognitive Education and Mediated Learning, 1(1), 5-16.
Jensen, M. R. (1992). Principles
of change models in school psychology and education. In: Carlson, J. (Ed.). Cognition and educational practice, Vol1B (pp.
47-72). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Jensen, M.R. (2000). The MindLadder model: Using dynamic assessment to help students
learn to assemble and use knowledge. In Lidz, C.S. & Elliott,J.G. (Eds.). Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications.
Amsterdam: JAI/Elsevier Science.
Jensen, M. R. (2003). Mediating knowledge construction: Towards a dynamic model
of assessment and learning. Part I: Philosophy and theory. Educational and Child Psychology,20(2), 100-117.
Jensen,
M. R. (2003). Mediating knowledge construction: Towards a dynamic model of assessment and learning. Part II: Applied programmes
and research.Educational and Child Psychology,20(2), 118-142.
Jensen, M.R. & Feuerstein, R. (1987). The Learning
Potential Assessment Device: From philosophy to practice.
In C.S. Lidz (Ed.). Dynamic assessment: An interactional
approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 379-402).
New York: Guilford.
Jensen, M.R., Feuerstein, R.,
Rand,.Y., Kaniel,S., & Tzuriel, D. (1988). Cultural difference and cultural deprivation: A theoretical framework for differential
intervention. In R.M. Gupta & P. Coxhead (Eds.). Cultural diversity and learning efficiency (pp. 643-88). London: MacMillan.
Jensen, M. R., Robinson-Zanartu, C., & Jensen, M. L. (1992). Dynamic assessment and mediated learning: Assessment
and intervention fordeveloping cognitive and knowledge structures. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Education, Advisory
Committee on the Reform of California's Testing Procedures in Special Education.
Jepsen, R.H. (2000). Dynamic
assessment of learners with severe developmental disabilities. In C.S. Lidz & J.G. Elliott (Eds.). Dynamic assessment:
Prevailing models and applications (pp. 577-605). Amsterdam: JAI/Elsevier Science.
Jepsen, R.H. & Lidz, C.S.
(2000). Group dynamic assessment procedure: Reliability and validity of a cognitive assessment procedure with adolescents
with developmental disabilities. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 1 (1)(electronic journal from International
Association of Cognitive Education webpage (www.iace.coged.org).
Jiang, S-C.(2006). A study of the Learning
Potential Assessment of Mental Ability for Preschool Children with immigrant mothers from South East Asia. Kaohsiung Normal
University Journal [Gao Xiong Shi Da Xue Bao], 12, 43-66.
Jitendra, A.K. (1992). An investigation of third-grade students'
mathematical word problem-solving utilizing assessment. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52(9-A), 3177.
Jitendra,
A.K. & Kaneenui, E.J. (1993). Dynamic assessment as a compensatory assesment approach: A description and analysis. RASE:Remedial
& Special Education, 14(5), 6-18.
Jitendra, A.K. & Kameenui, E.J. (1993). An exploratory study of dynamic
assessment involving two instructional strategies on experts and novices?performance in solving part-whole mathematical word
problems. Diagnostique, 18, 305-324.
Jitendra, A.K., Kameenui, E.J. & Carnine, D.W. (1994). An exploratory
evaluation of dynamic assessment and the role of basals on comprehension of mathematical operations. Education & Treatment
of Children, 17(2), 139-162.
Jitendra, A.K. & Rohena-Diaz, E. (1996). Language assessment of students who are
linguistically diverse: Why a discrete approach is not the answer. School Psychology Review, 25(1), 40-56.
Johnson,
D.L. (2008). Rapid dynamic assessment of expertise: A comparison of performance and mental efficiency measures in accordance
with cognitive load theory. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 68(11-A), 4674.
Johnson, K., Haywood, H. C., & Hays, D. R.. Effects of failure within the test on subsequent subtest performance.
Paper presented at the Third International Conference of the International Association for Cognitive Education, Riverside,
California, February, 1992.
Johnston, J.R. (2008). Narratives: Twenty-five years later. Topics in Language Disorders,
28(2), 93-98.
Johnston, P.H. (1990). A Vygotskian perspective on assessment in reading. In S.B.Sigmon (Ed.). Critical
voices on special education: Problems and progress concerning the mildly handicapped (pp. 103-119). Albany, NY: State University
of New York Press.
Jones, R.L.(1988). Psychoeducational assessment of minority group children: A casebook. Berkeley,
CA: Cobb and Henry Publishers.
Jonsson, A., Mattheos, N., Svingby, G. & Attstrom, R. (2007). Dynamic assessment
and the "interactive examination." Educational Technology & Society, 10(4), 17-27.
Kahn, R.J. (2000).
Dynamic assessment of infants and toddlers. In C.S. Lidz & J.G. Elliott (Eds.). Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models
and applications (pp. 325-373). Amsterdam: JAI/Elsevier Science.
Kahn, R.J. & King, S.R. (1997). Dynamic assessment
procedures for assessing children's cognitive and emotional strengths and needs. Journal of Cognitive Education, 6(2),
101-114.
Kalyuga, S. (2005). Rapid dynamic assessment of expertise to improve the efficiency of adaptive E-learning.
Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(3), 83-93.
Kanevsky, L. (1992). The Learning Game. In P. Klein
& A.J. Tannenbaum (Eds.). To be young and gifted (pp. 204-241). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Kanevsky, L. (1994). Exploring
the implications of dynamic and static assessments for gifted education. Exceptionality Education Canada, 4(2), 77-98.
Kanevsky, L. (1995). Learning potentials of gifted students. Roeper Review, 17(3), 157-163.
Kanevsky, L.
S., & Geake, J.(2005). Validating a multifactor model of learning potential with gifted students and their peers. Journal
for the Education of the Gifted, 28(2), 192-217.
Kanevsky, L. & Rapagna, S.O. (1990). Dynamic analysis of problem-solving
by average and high ability children. Canadian Journal of Special Education, 6(1), 15-30.
Kang, Y.S. (1998). Dynamic
assessment as a method of measuring intellectual ability of children with special needs. Educational Research, 8, 41-60.
Kaniel, S. (1992). The effect of mediation on level of performance and distribution of errors in the Raven Progressive
Matrices Test: A comparison of Ethiopian immigrant andnative Israeli adolescents. International Journal of Cognitive Education
and Mediated Learning, 2, 17-24.
Kaniel, S. (2000). A metacognitive decision-making model for dynamic assessment
and intervention. In C.S. Lidz & J.G. Elliott (Eds.). Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp. 643-679).
Amsterdam: JAI/Elsevier Science.
Kaniel, S. (2001). Not all testing is dynamic testing: Overcoming the fuzzy identity
of dynamic assessment. Issues in Education, 7, 211-224.
Kaniel, S. (2010). Domain specific vs domain general: Implications for dynamic assessment. Gifted Education International, 26, 93-107. Kaniel,
S., Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., Jensen, M. & Tzuriel, D. (1987). Prerequisites for assessment of learning potential: The
LPAD model. In C.S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interaction approach to evaluation of learning potential (pp. 196-214).
New York: Guilford.
Kaniel, S. & Fisherman, S. (1991). Level of performance and distribution of errors in the
Progressive Matrices Test: A comparison between Ethiopian and Israeli adolescents. International Journal of Psychology, 26,
25-33.
Kaniel, S. & Reichenberg, R. (1990). Dynamic assessment and cognitive programs for disadvantaged gifted
children. Gifted Education International, 7(1), 9-15.
Kaniel, S. & Tzuriel, D. (1992). Mediated Learning Experience
approach in assessment and treatmentof borderline psychotic adolescents. In H.C. Haywood & D. Tzuriel (Eds.), Interactive
assessment. New York: Springer Verlag.
Kaniel, S., Tzuriel, D., Feuerstein, R., Ben-Shachar, N., & Eitan, T.
(1991). Dynamic assessment: Learning and transfer abilities of Ethiopian immigrants to Israel. In R. Feuerstein, P.S. Klein,and
A.J. Tannenbaum (Eds.). Mediated Learning Experience (MLE): Theoretical,Psychosocial and learning implications. London: Freund.
Kar, B.C., Dash, U.N., Das, J.P. & Carlson, J. (1993). Two experiements on the dynamic assessment of planning.
Learning & Individual Differences, 5(1), 13-29.
Karpov, Y.V. (2000). Dynamic assessment of the level of internalization
of elementary school children's problem-solving activity. In C.S. Lidz & J.G.Elliott (Eds).
Dynamic assessment:Prevailing
models and applications (pp. 133-154). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Karpov, Y. (2008). Do all dynamic assessment
techniques assess learning potential? Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 7(3), 411-418.
Karpov, Y. V.&
Haywood, H. C. (1998). Two ways to elaborate Vygotsky? concept of mediation: Implications for education. American Psychologist,
53 (1), 27-36.
Katz, N., Golstand, S., Bar-Ilan, R.T., & Parush. S. (2007). The Dynamic Occupational Therapy
Cognitive Assessment for Children (DOTCA-Ch): A new instrument for assessing learning potential. American Journal of Occupational
Therapy, 61(1), 41-52.
Keane, K.J. (1987). Assessing deaf children. In C.S. Lidz (Ed.). Dynamic assessment: An
interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 360-376). New York: Guilford.
Kerwin, M.L. (1989).
Static versus dynamic assessment of intelligence. Dissertation Abstracts International, 50(6-B), 2645.
Kennedy,
H. (2006). Analysis of assessment and intervention frameworks in educational psychology services in Scotland: Past, present,
and possible worlds. School Psychology International, 27 (5), 515-534.
Kester, E.S. & Pe?a, E.D. (2001). Outcomes
of dynamic assesment with culturally and linguistically diverse students: A comparison of three teaching methods within a
test-teach-test framework. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 2, 42-49. (online: http://www.iacep.coged.org/journal)
Khani, M.S. & Gamlin, P.J. (1996). Validating the Similarity Thinking Instrument with preschool children: An investigation
of the ability of young children to generalize knowledge. In M.G. Luther, E. Cole et al. (Eds.). Dynamic assessment for instruction:
From theory to application (pp. 127-145). North York, ON: Captus.
Kirkwood, M.W., Weiler, M.D., Holmes Bernstein,
J., Forbes, P.W., & Waber, D.P. (2001). Sources of poor performance on the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test among children
with learning difficulties: A dynamic assessment approach. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 15(3), 345-356.
Kirschenbaum,
R.J. (1998). Dynamic assessment and its use with underserved gifted and talented populations. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42(3),
140-147.
Klauer, K.J. (1990). A process theory of inductive reasoning tested by the teaching of domain-specific
thinking strategies. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 5, 191-206.
Klauer, K.J. (1993). Learning potential
testing. The effect of retesting. In J.H.M. Hamers, K. Sijtsma, et al. (Eds.). Learning potential assessment:Theoretical,
methodological and practical issues (pp. 135-152). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Klein P.S. & Tzuriel, D.
(1986). Preschoolers' type of temperament as predictor of potential learning disability. Israeli Journal of Psychiatry and
Related Disciplines, 23, 49-61.
Kletzien, S.B. & Bednar, M.R. (1990). Dynamic assessment for at-risk readers.
Journal of Reading, 33(7), 528-533.
Kline, N. K. (2000). Validity of the Modified Dynamic Visual Processing Assessment. Israel Journal of Occupational
Therapy, 9, 69-88.
Kline, S.R. (1997). Sociocultural influences on the development of cognitive processing
as measured by the PASS+S Dynamic Assessment. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences,
57(8-A), 3392. Knodel, M (1996). Dynamic assessment of written language. Unpublished masters thesis.
University of Calgary (Canada), file 2083Knodel.pdf
Knutson, J.S., Simmons, D.C., Good, R., III, McD, S.H. (2004).
Specially designed assessment and instruction for children who have not responded adequately to reading intervention. Assessment
for Effective Instruction, 29(4), 47-58.
Koehler, L.S. (1978). Learning potential assessment of a hearing-impaired
population. Dissertation Abstracts International, 38(12-A), 7271.
Kolakowsky, S.A. (1998). Assessing learning potential
in patients with brain injury: Dynamic assessment. NeuroRehabilitation, 11(3), 227-238.
Kozulin, A. (2005). Learning
potential score as a predictor of sensitivity to cognitive intervention. Educational & Child Psychology, 22(1), 29-39.
Kozulin, A. (2008a). Evidence of culture-dependency
and modifiability of spatial memory of young adults. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 7(1), 70-80.
Kozulin, A (2008b).
Sociocultural paradigm. In J.W. Clegg (Ed.). The observation of Human Systerms: Lessons from the history of anti-reductionistic
empirical psychology (pp. 9-28). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Kozulin, A. (2009). Cognitive modifiability
of new immigrant adults. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 16, 117–129.
Kozulin, A. & Falik, L. (1995). Dynamic
cognitive assessment of the child. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4(6), 192-196.
Kozulin, A. &
Garb,E. (2002). Dynamic assessment of EFL text comprehension. School Psychology International, 23(1), 112-127.
Kozulin,
A. & Garb, E. (2004). Dynamic assessment of literacy: English as a third language. European Journal of Psychology of Education,
19(1), 65-77.
Kozulin, A. & Rand, Y. (2000). (Eds.). Experience of mediated learning: An impact of Feuerstein's
theory in education and psychology. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
Kragler, S. (1989). Dynamic versus static assessment:A
comparison of the effects of each on the reading placement of Chapter 1 students. Research report. ED327808
Krapf,
G.F. (1986). The effects of mediated intervention in advanced figural analogic problem-solving with deaf adolescents: Implications
for dynamic process assessment.
Dissertation Abstracts International, 47(3-A), 837-838.
Kuo, C-C, Chang, L-W,
& Wang, M-N. (2008). Mediating strategy of learning for children of culturally diverse and disadvantage. Korean Journal
of Thinking & Problem Solving, 18(1), 35-44.
|
|
